Subject	You are looking at the power curve. But there is a problem
Posted by	Russell@Z1 on February 11, 2004 at 10:51 AM
	This message has been viewed 294 times.
In Reply To	Why does the first chart say max torque of 384, yet the posted by bb300z(NoVA) on February 11, 2004 at 10:21 AM
Message	with dynojet's runviewer apparently. HEre is the same graph with 'force scaling' enabled. And here is the link to the dynojet file itself. You will need to download the runviewer to view the file, and it is a free download through dynojet. If you have doubts, you can see for yourself. Russell Floyd Z1 Motorsports www.z1motorsports.com 1990+ Nissan Z specialists Used Parts, New parts, Service/Repair and Performance 1200 Carrollton Hwy Temple, Ga 30179 770-562-8668 770-562-8664 (fax)
Follow Ups	Someone asked us for a dyno comparison between stock - John@Z1 09:58:38 02/11/04 Would have been even nicer if the graphs were the same scale - KaZ (VaBch) 10:03:50 02/11/04 Exactly what I was thinking, maybe even the same graph - Japocalipse 10:05:53 02/11/04 yea, but that would make sense. - genic 10:07:58 02/11/04 *invent (n/m) - Stealth021 11:07:16 02/11/04 *write (n/m) - mongoozTT 11:21:00 02/11/04 i've never seen such bitches - joel(PA) 11:56:43 02/11/04 Yeah lots, wanna list? (n/m) - KaZ (VaBch) 12:23:47 02/11/04 Or even if they were on the same kind of dyno.... (n/m) - Lordrandall 10:23:54 02/11/04 Why does the first chart say max torque of 384, yet the - bb300z(NoVA) 10:21:20 02/11/04 opps. Meant 300. (n/m) - bb300z(NoVA) 10:32:53 02/11/04 You are looking at the power curve. But there is a problem - Russell@Z1 10:51:57 02/11/04 Thanks Russell. That looks much better. (n/m) - bb300z(NoVA) 10:56:11 02/11/04 So a correct comparison would be >>> - KaZ (VaBch) 11:05:51 02/11/04 no (n/m) - alcky 12:50:17 02/11/04 What do you mean no? (n/m) - KaZ (VaBch) 14:00:00 02/11/04 ;-) (n/m) - RegalZ 11:45:21 02/11/04 it would be nice if they where at the same dyno. - Halo Z 12:03:01 02/11/04 Take this for what it's worth: - Marshall 12:09:57 02/11/04 Thanks man! (n/m) - John@Z1 12:26:55 02/11/04 sure is odd anytime someone makes a hp claim, ppl call - takirb 12:15:33 02/11/04 who designed these cam profiles? sunbelt? - aliaZ 12:26:01 02/11/04 " qualified? " I find it funny too. - ZBlacktt 13:25:47 02/11/04 It's a legitimate question - aliaZ 14:20:18 02/11/04 fwiw - aliaZ 14:52:51 02/11/04 fwiw - ZBlacktt 15:15:30 02/11/04 Re: " qualified? " I find it funny too. - Velox 21:05:35 02/11/04 agreed (n/m) - aliaZ 21:40:34 02/11/04 True, but their facts hold record - ZBlacktt 03:41:21 02/12/04 that is besides the point (n/m) - aliaZ 07:54:48 02/12/04 Hmmm, A few questions - Good2Zya 12:39:20 02/11/04 Both runs were on a dynojet and SAE corrected - Russell@Z1 21:50:34 02/11/04 thanks. Is there a core charge on these? (n/m) - aliaZ 14:50:53 02/11/04 I don't represent Z1, but I wouldn't think so. I'd think - NC_Z 15:57:05 02/11/04 were the cams the *only* change made? - aliaZ 21:40:02 02/11/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.